-
Видео и презентации вебинара № 3 сессии осень – зима 2024 семинара Климова-Зателепина 6 ноября 2024 (среда)
Эдвард Льюис, независимый ученый, Иллинойс, США
Доклад состоит из двух частей:
- Как история физики помогает предсказать развитие исследований микроплазмоидов
- Характеристики шаровой молнии помогают понять «странные частицы»Edward Lewis, BA, Independent Scholar, e2023@fastmail.com
What the History of Physics Helps Us Predict About the Development of the Microplasmoid FieldI realized that a paradigm shift in physics was happening in 1989 based on the cold fusion, ball lightning (BL) and other anomalies of the period from 1970 to 1989. In the history of physics, paradigm shifts happened every 80 years starting from Copernicus in 1506 as the figure above shows(1). Nowadays, some of the leading theorists who propose a model of what I call “microplasmoids” and what Russians usually call “strange radiation” are saying that a paradigm shift is happening in physics. Among these are Mishinsky and Lutz Jaitner. Scientific revolutions and the development of paradigms of physics are a 3-generation process, and based on the past timing of paradigm development, we can predict what might happen in the future development of this field.
Each paradigm shift in physics has had three generations who developed the paradigm. For example, after Einstein introduced the basic ideas of quantum mechanics and relativity theory in 1905, another generation who grew up familiar with his ideas helped the two theories to develop to full development in the 1940s. Physicists including Tomonaga and Swinger helped to develop Quantum Electrodynamics to a high level and received Nobel prizes in 1948. Then a third generation grew up who were familiar with quantum mechanics from their youth, and they started to find anomalies. See the article(1). Superconductivity was one such major anomaly discovered in the 1980s. Then from 1989 onwards, the CF anomalies and micro BL/microplasmoid anomalies were discovered by many including Matsumoto and Shoulders. This work helped me to understand that there is a 5th state of matter in the early 1990s that I called the BL or plasmoid state. However, because there was a lack of evidence since these anomalies were never widely studied around the world and few really understood their existence, I felt there was not enough evidence to develop a complete theory. All I could do is try to guess about the structure and properties of this kind of matter. What is happening now might be similar to what happened with the Copernican and Galilean paradigms. Because there was strong opposition from the Catholic leadership against heliocentric theory and their physics, both men sort of hid their much of their work until they were old. However, both paradigms developed in about 80 years. Since there is strong opposition now, I do not know when the world will generally accept this physics. However, the second stage of extensive theoretical development usually starts about 20 years after theoretical formulation. The second stage ends about 40 years after theoretical formulation, in this case, 2032, and then during an industrial revolution based on the new paradigm industries start to be built about 60 or 70 years after theoretical formulation. At the same time, experimenters discover many anomalies during a crisis period that Kuhn wrote lasts 10 or 20 years. It may be important for the development of this paradigm that many more people believe that the microplasmoids exist and cause transmutation and indepth research begin.
E. Lewis, “Paradigm Shifts in Physics Cause the Kondratieff Wave,” Cycles Magazine, 2022.Ball Lightning Characteristics Help Us Understand the Strange Particles: Micro Ball Lightning
In general, the study of ball lightning (BL) properties will help people to understand what I call “microplasmoids” such as the “strange radiation” produced by various Russian groups and those produced decades earlier by Bostick, Matsumoto and Shoulders. Shoulders called them “EVs.” This is how the micro ball lightning (MBL) field started in the early 1990s. After studying and learning about natural BL properties and characteristics, I realized that Matsumoto was producing MBL and encouraged him to start research on them. He experimented and attended BL symposiums. Understanding microplasmoids as MBL has been very fruitful. Knowing how BL behaves helps us to understand whether models and hypotheses about the experimental micrometer-sized microplasmoids are correct and helps to produce a general theory about plasmoid state materials and also liquid, solid, gas and plasma.
History of MBL Research: In the early 1990s, I realized that the atoms themselves can enter a state in which they behave like BL. I called this state the “BL state” or alternatively the “plasmoid state” of matter.(1) I realized the anomalous reactions of the cold fusion field occurred when this state of matter was formed in experiments and that the microplasmoids could convert regular material to be in this state. In the middle 1990s, Matsumoto and Shoulders both experimentally showed that microplasmoids produced tracks and transmutation. Shoulders focused on explaining though his extensive experimental research that EV objects have black and white states into which they shift(2), and he also explained other anomalous phenomena such as the “cold sloshing” phenomena in which the objects move materials without heat as if they make atoms of materials become superfluid.(3) Any model of microplasmoids much explain these anomalies as well as BL size and duration and gravity-like effects.
Models and Explanations: In Russia, there have been several theories about “strange radiation.” Two of the larger groups have espoused Lochak monopoles and dark hydrogen. Urutskoev and others modeled these as light leptonic magnetic monopoles as proposed by Lochak. Then Baranov explained these as nuclear molecules. Others currently model these as dark hydrogen. Others such as Nikitin have their own ideas about these objects. Mishinsky and Lutz Jaitner both propose solenoid models. In 2022, Mishinsky conjectured that external magnetic fields connect orthobosons into electronic orthoboson “solenoids” or capsules that are toroids. However, I do not see that he includes an explanation of state shifting, cold sloshing, BL size, or the many kinds of tracks as Jaitner did. Jaitner proposes a thin cylindrical plasma channel core consisting of delocalized electrons and fully ionized nuclei, and if conditions are right, the plasma channel “wire” may link ends to form a solenoid of various configurations. He does try to explain BL size, state shifting, cold sloshing and even the caterpillar track markings. However, his model doesn’t explain black state properties such as passage through materials without any damage, BL aerial sharp turns without acceleration, or gravity effects. A common assumption of many theorists is that where it seems like there has been melting of material due to contact with microplasmoids, that this necessarily means that heating happened. In a 2024 article in RENSIT by Parkhomov, they wrote: “During the movement [of the charged dust particles], heat is released … can lead to melting of the material on which the tracts are formed….” In contrast, natural BL and the microplasmoids of Shoulders caused materials to flow in fluid-like ways without heating. Shoulders showed this by the use of wax on the detector material. The flowing atoms were cold.(2,3) This shows that these objects are not “dust particles” or any common type of matter. Parkhomov wrote that he was not talking about BL in his note in my last abstract I sent about a month ago for the RCCNT and BL conference.
1) E. Lewis, “The Ball Lightning State in Cold Fusion,” Proceedings of the ICCF10, 2003. 2) K. Shoulders, EV: A Tale of Discovery, 1987. 3) K. Shoulders, “Charged Clusters in Action,” 1999.Опубликовано
← Старые Новые →